81
/100
B
◉ Complete 4⁄4
codebase-context
Local MCP server that shows AI agents which patterns your team actually uses, what files a change will affect, and when there is not enough context to trust an edit. 30+ languages, fully local.
Glama
Complete visibility
— 4/4 applicable dimensions scored
✓ Schema Quality
— Protocol
— Reliability
✓ Docs & Maintenance
✓ Security Hygiene
✓ Schema Interpretability
Schema Quality
64
42% weight
Protocol Compliance
N/A
Local server
Reliability
N/A
Local server
Docs & Maintenance
71
25% weight
Security Hygiene
95
33% weight
Schema Interpretability
94
15% weight
Score History
Category Trends
Static Analysis
| Metric | Score | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Schema Completeness | 40 | Fair |
| Description Quality | 100 | Good |
| Documentation Coverage | 72 | Good |
| Maintenance Pulse | 81 | Good |
| Dependency Health | 75 | Good |
| License Clarity | — | Poor |
| Version Hygiene | 90 | Good |
Analyzed 1 month ago
Add this to your README to display your MCP Scoreboard grade:
