82
/100
B
◉ Complete 5⁄5
tengu
AI-powered penetration testing MCP server
Links:
MCP Surface
Tools: 80
Complete visibility
— 5/5 applicable dimensions scored
✓ Schema Quality
✓ Protocol
— Reliability
✓ Docs & Maintenance
✓ Security Hygiene
✓ Schema Interpretability
Schema Quality
62
42% weight
Protocol Compliance
N/A
Local server
Reliability
N/A
Local server
Docs & Maintenance
79
25% weight
Security Hygiene
95
33% weight
Schema Interpretability
96
15% weight
Score History
Category Trends
Static Analysis
| Metric | Score | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Schema Completeness | 40 | Fair |
| Description Quality | 80 | Good |
| Documentation Coverage | 75 | Good |
| Maintenance Pulse | 71 | Good |
| Dependency Health | 100 | Good |
| License Clarity | 100 | Good |
| Version Hygiene | 55 | Fair |
Analyzed 1 month ago
Protocol Compliance
Schema Issues (350)
validate_target.target: missing description
nmap_scan.target: missing description
nmap_scan.ports: missing description
nmap_scan.scan_type: missing description
nmap_scan.timing: missing description
nmap_scan.os_detection: missing description
nmap_scan.scripts: missing description
nmap_scan.timeout: missing description
masscan_scan.target: missing description
masscan_scan.ports: missing description
masscan_scan.rate: missing description
masscan_scan.timeout: missing description
subfinder_enum.domain: missing description
subfinder_enum.sources: missing description
subfinder_enum.timeout: missing description
... and 335 more
Probed 1 month ago
Add this to your README to display your MCP Scoreboard grade:
