60
/100
C
◐ Assessed 3⁄3
awesome-mcp-best-practices
Build Awesome MCPs with Awesome Best Practices for MCP Servers and MCP Clients
Links:
Assessed visibility
— 3/3 applicable dimensions scored
✓ Schema Quality
— Protocol
— Reliability
✓ Docs & Maintenance
✓ Security Hygiene
— Schema Interpretability
Schema Quality
48
42% weight
Protocol Compliance
N/A
Local server
Reliability
N/A
Local server
Docs & Maintenance
35
25% weight
Security Hygiene
95
33% weight
Score History
Category Trends
Static Analysis
| Metric | Score | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Schema Completeness | 30 | Poor |
| Description Quality | 75 | Good |
| Documentation Coverage | 35 | Poor |
| Maintenance Pulse | 34 | Poor |
| Dependency Health | — | Poor |
| License Clarity | 100 | Good |
| Version Hygiene | — | Poor |
Analyzed 1 month ago
Add this to your README to display your MCP Scoreboard grade:
