77
/100
B
◉ Complete 5⁄5
mcp-micromanage
Controls coding agents by enforcing structured implementation plans with PRs and commits as work units, requiring user review at each commit checkpoint to prevent agents from going off track. Includes a visualization dashboard for tracking progress in real-time.
Glama
MCP Surface
Tools: 3
Schema Drift
Complete visibility
— 5/5 applicable dimensions scored
✓ Schema Quality
✓ Protocol
— Reliability
✓ Docs & Maintenance
✓ Security Hygiene
✓ Schema Interpretability
Schema Quality
76
42% weight
Protocol Compliance
N/A
Local server
Reliability
N/A
Local server
Docs & Maintenance
41
25% weight
Security Hygiene
95
33% weight
Schema Interpretability
60
15% weight
Score History
Category Trends
Static Analysis
| Metric | Score | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Schema Completeness | 60 | Fair |
| Description Quality | 100 | Good |
| Documentation Coverage | 40 | Fair |
| Maintenance Pulse | 20 | Poor |
| Dependency Health | 55 | Fair |
| License Clarity | 100 | Good |
| Version Hygiene | — | Poor |
Analyzed 1 month, 1 week ago
Protocol Compliance
Probed 1 month, 1 week ago
Add this to your README to display your MCP Scoreboard grade:
