80
/100
B
◉ Complete 5⁄5
mcp-as-a-judge
MCP as a Judge: a behavioral MCP that strengthens AI coding assistants via explicit LLM evaluations
Links:
MCP Surface
Tools: 9
Complete visibility
— 5/5 applicable dimensions scored
✓ Schema Quality
✓ Protocol
— Reliability
✓ Docs & Maintenance
✓ Security Hygiene
✓ Schema Interpretability
Schema Quality
60
42% weight
Protocol Compliance
N/A
Local server
Reliability
N/A
Local server
Docs & Maintenance
81
25% weight
Security Hygiene
95
33% weight
Schema Interpretability
86
15% weight
Score History
Category Trends
Static Analysis
| Metric | Score | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Schema Completeness | 40 | Fair |
| Description Quality | 75 | Good |
| Documentation Coverage | 72 | Good |
| Maintenance Pulse | 71 | Good |
| Dependency Health | 100 | Good |
| License Clarity | 100 | Good |
| Version Hygiene | 90 | Good |
Analyzed 1 month, 1 week ago
Protocol Compliance
Schema Issues (65)
set_coding_task.user_request: missing description
set_coding_task.task_title: missing description
set_coding_task.task_description: missing description
set_coding_task.task_size: missing description
set_coding_task.task_id: missing description
set_coding_task.user_requirements: missing description
set_coding_task.state: missing description
set_coding_task.tags: missing description
request_plan_approval.plan: missing description
request_plan_approval.design: missing description
request_plan_approval.research: missing description
request_plan_approval.task_id: missing description
request_plan_approval.research_urls: missing description
request_plan_approval.problem_domain: missing description
request_plan_approval.problem_non_goals: missing description
... and 50 more
Probed 1 month, 1 week ago
Add this to your README to display your MCP Scoreboard grade:
