30
/100
F
◐ Assessed 4⁄3
Project Management Validation
Validate project data against NISTA standards, scheduling best practices, and custom rules
Links:
Prompt Injection Risk
Assessed visibility
— 4/3 applicable dimensions scored
✓ Schema Quality
✓ Protocol
— Reliability
✓ Docs & Maintenance
✓ Security Hygiene
— Schema Interpretability
Schema Quality
48
42% weight
Protocol Compliance
N/A
Local server
Reliability
N/A
Local server
Docs & Maintenance
59
25% weight
Security Hygiene
87
33% weight
Score History
Category Trends
Static Analysis
| Metric | Score | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Schema Completeness | 40 | Fair |
| Description Quality | 60 | Fair |
| Documentation Coverage | 60 | Fair |
| Maintenance Pulse | 65 | Fair |
| Dependency Health | — | Poor |
| License Clarity | 100 | Good |
| Version Hygiene | 65 | Fair |
Analyzed 7 months, 2 weeks ago
Add this to your README to display your MCP Scoreboard grade:
