71
/100
B
◐ Assessed 4⁄3
sage
Institutional memory for AI agents with real BFT consensus. 4 application validators vote on every memory before it's committed — no more storing garbage. 13 MCP tools, runs locally, works with any MCP-compatible model. Backed by 4 published research papers.
Glama
Assessed visibility
— 4/3 applicable dimensions scored
✓ Schema Quality
✓ Protocol
— Reliability
✓ Docs & Maintenance
✓ Security Hygiene
— Schema Interpretability
Schema Quality
56
42% weight
Protocol Compliance
N/A
Local server
Reliability
N/A
Local server
Docs & Maintenance
80
25% weight
Security Hygiene
91
33% weight
Score History
Category Trends
Static Analysis
| Metric | Score | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Schema Completeness | 40 | Fair |
| Description Quality | 80 | Good |
| Documentation Coverage | 64 | Fair |
| Maintenance Pulse | 86 | Good |
| Dependency Health | 75 | Good |
| License Clarity | 100 | Good |
| Version Hygiene | 90 | Good |
Analyzed 2 months, 2 weeks ago
Add this to your README to display your MCP Scoreboard grade:
